CAR TOTALED

19 Responses to “EcoTech-RMI & Efficient Cars”

1. tcseeme Says:
   May 7th, 2009 at 9:02 am

   Why does this guy keep talking about “moving the driver”. The driver isn’t going to go anywhere if the car doesn’t move - unless he gets out and walks.

2. MotownMoleman Says:
   May 7th, 2009 at 9:02 am

   So if hybrid or electric vehicles are the future, why have European and Japanese automakers not lead the way? These nations have more expensive petrol prices; “greener” people/politics and better market demographics. Don’t preach EV vehicles. They’re a joke. America’s job is not necessarily to lead the world in automotive innovation. Even if it was, it wouldn’t be in something as ENVIABLE as EV.

3. dzhang78 Says:
   May 7th, 2009 at 9:02 am

   your comment sounds very familiar… oh yeah, heard from IBM on PCs and Mckinsey on cell phones…..

4. dzhang78 Says:
   May 7th, 2009 at 9:02 am

   juscurious, your comment sounds very familiar… oh yeah, heard from IBM on PCs and Mckinsey on cell phones…..

5. dib00 Says:
   May 7th, 2009 at 9:02 am

   1. Car companies did think of some of these concepts. However they were never implemented for several reasons mostly related to the profitability of making gas guzzlers. Check out the documentary “who killed the electric car”
   2. The method they use to produce a Carbon Fiber car frame is actually cheaper to then to produce it out of metal. It does however require an upfront investment in new equipment.
   3. Carbon fiber is mindblowing light compared to metal, and it is 10 times stronger than steel

6. juscurious Says:
   May 7th, 2009 at 9:02 am

   This guy is a total fraud. Believe me the car companies have thought about all of these things. They are super expensive! If these things were do easy people would have already thought of them. The weights of our current cars are much lighter than they used to be. Everyone knows this. Don’t pay any attention to Lovins.

7. JeepGuy099 Says:
   May 7th, 2009 at 9:02 am

   well as with everything thats new… prices go down!

8. Elvarks Says:
   May 7th, 2009 at 9:02 am

   what’s the point making such a car when only 3% of the population can afford it?

9. NNT Says:
   May 7th, 2009 at 9:02 am

   I am the very sexual lady, who just wants to make your day brighter and may be a little happier, to give you the sunshine of my look and positive energy of my love..So cute girl awaiting you to share an unforgattable pleasure;) come visit me at - Play-Cam _dot_ COM - my user-id there is Paige-wccf chat soon on cam

10. BIGDAVOLK Says:
    May 7th, 2009 at 9:02 am

    Hey catch me in naked on my personal webpage meetyourfling(.Com)
    94046487

11. terry1919 Says:
    May 7th, 2009 at 9:02 am

    simple thermodynamics the Carnot engine cycle 90% of the Chemical energy is WASTED HEAT…

12. bigmouthblackface2 Says:
    May 7th, 2009 at 9:02 am

    ECO cars rule!

13. cryptostorm Says:
    May 7th, 2009 at 9:02 am

    im still puzzled as to why nobody has started work on a LP or NG hybrid car yet…

14. shsnawada Says:
    May 7th, 2009 at 9:02 am

    In one of his lectures, he advocated new urbanism and better land use, so its not as if he’s all for superhighways.

15. fueltvfan Says:
    May 7th, 2009 at 9:02 am

    it’s a hybrid, gas/electric

16. chisimwa Says:
    May 7th, 2009 at 9:02 am

    What is the fuel is this car???

17. visionbmw Says:
    May 7th, 2009 at 9:02 am

    Hey bro, trust me! i thought i try that site, to see if i can really get some action and it works! its free join today > FLING-CHAT dot COM
    P55562051

18. bentdrum Says:
    May 7th, 2009 at 9:02 am

    While the technology is very cool, it only addresses better fuel economy and improved emissions. It does not address the fact regardless of how a privately-owned car is powered major cities will remain clogged with them, demanding parking spots and continued road building and widening.

19. nabiliomaximo Says:
    May 7th, 2009 at 9:02 am

    Go Amory go! You’re light years ahead of everyone else.

Leave a Reply